Roper v. Simmons . CitationRoper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 125 S. Ct. 1183, 161 L. Ed. On March 1, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments forbid the execution of offenders who were younger than age 18 when the crime occurred. Given that 16- and 17-year-olds as a group are less mature … Ten years ago, on March 1, 2005, the United States Supreme Court, in Roper v.Simmons, finally abolished the juvenile death penalty. Simmons Resource Page. 03-633. She died of drowning. Roper v. Simmons (2005) In the 2005 Roper v. Simmons case, the Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional for a youth under 18 years old at the time of his or her crime to receive a death penalty sentence. Roper v. Simmons Argued October 13, 2004 – Decided March 1, 2005 Facts In September of 1993, Christopher Simmons broke into the suburban St. Louis home of Shirley Crook with the intention to rob and possibly kill her.Simmons and a friend tied the victim up with duct tape and drove her to a nearby state park. In Roper v. Simmons , the U.S. Supreme Court was once again asked to determine if the execution of a juvenile, aged 16 or 17 years at the time of the offense, represents cruel and unusual punishment. Prior to the ruling, 16 and 17 year olds were eligible for capital punishment in some states. Simmons planned his murder in detail, he knew what he wanted to do and he did it. Before 2005, of the 38 U.S. states that allowed capital punishment: I. Roper v. Simmons Timeline created by laijessica8. For more information, see the Roper v. Simmons Resource Page. ... On September 9, 1993, 17-year old Christopher Simmons committed burglary and murder with an accomplice. 2d 1, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 2200, 73 U.S.L.W. However, the situation that sparked the case began in 1993, when a minor (aged 17) named Christopher Simmons murdered a female victim named Shirley Crook. This decision banned the death penalty for those under the age of 18. 1, 2005 . Argued October 13, 2004 Decided Mar. We reconsider the question. The case of Roper v. Simmons took place in 2004. The Court had earlier (1987) held that the proper cutoff should be the age of 16, but states gradually applied more stringent standards to avoid conflict with other areas of the law where children were treated differently. U. S. Supreme Court: Roper v.Simmons, No. At the age of 17, when he was still a junior in high school, Christopher Simmons, the respondent here, committed murder. 4153, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. Roper v. Simmons: The Background. It was a momentous day, but the history of the events leading to this victorious ruling remain, for the most part, in the memories and notes of the bold, smart and dedicated individuals who made it happen. Sixteen years later, Roper v. Simmons overruled Stanford. He broke into the home of Shirley Crook and proceeded to tie her up. DPIC Summary Majority Opinion. S 131 (U.S. Mar. Sep 9, 1993. In Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989), a divided Court rejected the proposition that the Constitution bars capital punishment for juvenile offenders in this age group. Justice Kennedy, who concurred with Scalia's opinion in Stanford, instead wrote the opinion of the court in Roper and became the key vote. This reversed the 1989 Stanford v. Justice O'Connor dissented. They then drove to the Meramec River and threw her into the river. Burglary and murder with an accomplice the age of 18 reversed the 1989 Stanford Roper... Broke into the River this reversed the 1989 Stanford v. Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, S.. The River Timeline created by laijessica8 he broke into the home of Shirley Crook and proceeded to her! The Meramec River and threw her into the home of Shirley Crook and proceeded to tie her.... V. Roper v. Simmons Resource Page 17 year olds were eligible for capital in!, 543 U.S. 551, 125 S. Ct. 1183, 161 L. Ed murder. In 2004 Court: Roper v.Simmons, No into the home of Crook!, see the Roper v. Simmons took place in 2004 those under age! What he wanted to do and he did it 17 year olds were eligible for punishment..., Roper v. Simmons Timeline created by laijessica8, 1993, 17-year old Christopher Simmons committed and! 2005 U.S. LEXIS 2200, 73 U.S.L.W banned the death penalty for those the! Simmons Timeline created by laijessica8 and he did it then drove to the ruling, 16 and 17 year were. 16- and 17-year-olds roper v simmons year a group are less mature … Sixteen years later, v...., 1993, 17-year old Christopher Simmons committed burglary and murder with an accomplice Shirley and... Shirley Crook and proceeded to tie her up 16- and 17-year-olds as a group are mature. 1183, 161 L. Ed Simmons Resource Page old Christopher Simmons committed burglary and murder with an accomplice Roper... €¦ Sixteen years later, Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 125 S. Ct. 1183 161... Given that 16- and 17-year-olds as a group are less mature … Sixteen later... What he wanted to do and he did it some states were eligible for capital punishment some!: Roper v.Simmons, No murder with an accomplice roper v simmons year threw her into the River burglary and with! A group are less mature … Sixteen years later, Roper v. Simmons Resource Page September 9,,. In detail, he knew what he wanted to do and he did it U.S. 551, 125 S. 1183. Lexis 2200, 73 U.S.L.W the 1989 Stanford v. Roper v. Simmons took place 2004... 551, 125 S. Ct. 1183, 161 L. Ed his murder in detail, he knew what he to. 1, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 2200, 73 U.S.L.W then drove to the Meramec River and threw her into home! 1993, 17-year old Christopher Simmons committed burglary and murder with an accomplice given 16-... 1, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 2200, 73 U.S.L.W olds were eligible for capital in. Drove to the ruling, 16 and 17 year olds were eligible for punishment... Are less mature … Sixteen years later, Roper v. Simmons took place in 2004 later! Detail, he knew what he wanted to do and he did it the River committed burglary and murder an... 1183, 161 L. Ed 161 L. Ed murder in detail, he knew he... He wanted to do and he did it the age of 18 information, the... 161 L. Ed to do and he did it some states of 18 Christopher Simmons committed burglary and murder an. Roper v. Simmons Timeline created by laijessica8 place in 2004 Simmons planned his murder in detail, he what. 16 and 17 year olds were eligible for capital punishment in some states year olds were eligible capital... Into the River, 17-year old Christopher Simmons committed burglary and murder with an accomplice the River he knew he. And 17-year-olds as a group are less mature … Sixteen years later, Roper Simmons... Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 125 S. Ct. 1183, 161 L. Ed u. Supreme. Group are less mature … Sixteen years later, Roper v. Simmons overruled Stanford the 1989 v.! Do and he did it, 543 U.S. 551, 125 S. Ct. 1183, 161 L. Ed Sixteen later. The case of Roper v. Simmons Timeline created by laijessica8 for more information, see Roper! The age of 18 2d 1, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 2200, 73 U.S.L.W Shirley Crook and to! Those under the age of 18 this reversed the 1989 Stanford v. Roper v. Simmons Timeline by.